English Learning Methods Essay Example for Free

English Learning Methods Essay Although most people can realize the importance of English in modern life. Mastering English is quite difficult for them, Why? Because they dont find out a suitable way to learn. I state you about the way to learn English I think it is the best. It is combination of two factors: learning inside the class and learning outside the class. Learning inside the class is very necessary for learners for experience, a good environment for practicing and motivation of studying. Firstly, you should take part fully in class to get knowledge from teachers who can share their valuable experiences for studying English with us, and they also give comment or feed back about your mistakes if you have , they can explain about what you dont understand the English lessons. Second, class is good environment for studying, is where we can communicate with your friends in English and check your knowledge level, beside when you learn inside the class, you have competition with others, which make you have more motivation for studying but joining in class every day isnt still enough time for your practice to become a good learner. You should spend more time on practicing yourself at home. Learning English outside is also important. You can study English online at home with threes reasons: not spend much fees, have suitable lesson for each person and have more interesting for lessons. First learning English online at home, which decrease fees for us and dont much time for moving, second there are many kinds of lesson which are suitable with each learners level, there are courses for beginners, both adults and children, as well as more advanced courses for those who work their way up through the lessons. The advanced lessons are also suitable for those who do have the basics of the English language and want to increase their skills in reading, speaking, listening and writing. Thirdly, having many funny activities from English online course. It makes learners more interesting for studying. For example, play funny games such as play cards, puzzle, crossword, or hangman. Moreover, you can watch English film, listen to English news, read English newspaper or chat with native speakers. Many people have the idea that learning English is a difficult process. In fact, the opposite is true and the language is really easy to learn if you spend time on practicing it everyday with above method. You will become a good learner English.

The Power of Fate in Macbeth Essay -- William Shakespeare

Fate is one person's destiny, it cannot be understood by mere mortals but a greater power beyond human comprehension. Fate is so powerful that it controls a person's outcome on life before it happens. Many people become victims of fate in which they catch a glimpse of what their future is going to look like, but do not totally grasp the outcome. Macbeth cannot fully comprehend the possible outcome of his fate because he is mortal, and therefore is a victim to his power driven quest and his ultimate fate. Many have been said to agree with this statement. For example, as stated in Shakespeare A to Z, "The Witches are an enactment of the irrational. The supernatural world if terrifying because it is beyond human control, and in the play it is therefore symbolic of the unpredictable force of human motivation." The magic of the witches is thus an image of human moral disruption. Through their own uncertain nature, they demonstrate- and promote- the disruption in the world of they play. The outcome of the first prophecy or encounter with the Witches is the beginning of Macbeth's downfall. After Macbeth was told about his potential reign as king, Macbeth said, "Stay, you imperfect speakers. Tell me more. By Sinel's death I know I am Thane-of Glamis. But how of Cawdor?...You owe this strange intelligence or why upon this blasted heath you stop our way with such a prophetic greeting. Speak, I charge you." (1.3.73.) After Macbeth tried to ask questions, the witches vanished. The witches seem to have watched Macbeth and studied how he is. They know his weaknesses are his greed and ambition, and by telling him this specific part of his destiny, his weaknesses will overcome his virtues. The witches then left Macbeth at this time possibly be... ...ant. As stated by Frank Kermode in the book Shakespeare for Students, ?Macbeth is a play about the eclipse of civility and manhood, the temporary triumph of evil, when it ends, virtue, and justice are restored.? ?Shakespeare displays a remarkable perception of the human condition by dramatizing not only the way in which evil enters Macbeth?s world, but also the devastating effect it has on those who yield to temptation and sin? (Shakespeare for Students page 238.) Macbeth is merely a victim of his fate. In this case, the weird sisters represent the wrath and cunningness of the various ways fate can play out. Fate has so much power that it can take over a person and leave them feeling almost possessed. If Macbeth were immortal and could understand his fate, he might have saved himself, but because he is mortal he is tricked, and subsequently, destroyed by fate.

Religious responses to the verification principle have been largely unsuccessful Essay

‘Religious responses to the verification principle have been largely unsuccessful.’ Evaluate this claim. (20 marks) The Verification Principle claims that it is meaningless to talk about God and ethics etc, as these cannot be verified using empirical evidence or scientific experiments. There have however been many responses to this theory, for example the falsification principle. This is a theory developed by Anthony Flew who says that for a statement to have meaning it must be able to be proven false. So that not religious meaning. This theory is similar to the verification principle but just to prove something wrong instead, however it’s a stronger argument, as it does not go beyond our understanding of God and religion. In response to the falsification principle, R.M Hare criticised it with his theory of the ‘blik’, which is an individual’s own personal opinion and meaningful statements. He says that you cannot falsify the blik because it holds meaning to the individual. Christians will think in their minds that God is good; this is their own thought so we cannot prove their ‘blik’ wrong. However, Flew replies to this criticism saying that this is not relevant and cannot be applied to religious language as it has not happened in real life, just in someone’s mind. Another response to the verification principle is the Via Negativa; this is a theory that suggests that to fully understand what God is we need to say what he isn’t. In addition, Moses Maimonides said that positive statement such as ‘God is powerful enough to lift a rock’, limits God because we are comparing Him to a human and assuming we know what He can do. This is a cogent argument because we cannot understand properly a God we have never seen before, we can only imagine our own personal God and when we die we will then be enlightened with the real God, if there is one at all. However, St Thomas Aquinas rejected the Via Negativa as he believed that there are positive things to say about God. He argued that the only we way we can legitimately speak about God is using analogy. This involves making a comparison between two things, one is familiar and helps us understand another thing and both have similar meanings. He gave examples such as, the analogy of proportion and attribution. However some philosophers criticised this, such as Richard Swinburne who suggested that sometimes words could be used univocally about god. However if you say God is good, this could mean the same way humans are good. Therefore Aquinas is using the word good univocally Aquinas’ theory of analogy is a strong argument as it doesn’t limit God or use ambiguous language. Another response to this that involves the meaning of religious language is symbol. There are many symbols that have meaning to religious people and non -religious people. For example the star of St David for Jews and symbols such as the first aid cross which obviously does have a meaning. However, some symbols change over time for example, the Hindu symbol of peace was adapted by Adolf Hitler to produce the infamous Swastika that reminds people of sadness and death. So it raises the question whether symbols are reliable or not to show meaning. To conclude, I think there are a few reasonable responses to the verification principle such as the falsification principle, as this does not limit God to our understanding but we can still talk about Him. Also the doctrine of analogy is a strong theory as we can compare one thing to another thing we are familiar with without properly describing the unfamiliar thing and this makes it easier for us to understand. However, symbols can often be misinterpreted and lead to confusion, as they don’t say enough about God and religion for people to fully understand.

Eleanor of Aquitaines Children and Grandchildren

Eleanor of Aquitaine has been called the â€Å"grandmother of Europe† for the connections of her children and grandchildren to many royal houses.  Here are the children and grandchildren of Eleanor of Aquitaine: First Marriage: to Louis VII of France Eleanor of Aquitaine (1122 – 1204) married Prince Louis of France, later Louis VII of France (1120 – 1180), on July 25, 1137. Their marriage was annulled in 1152, and Louis maintained custody of their daughters. 1. Marie, Countess of Champagne Marie of France (1145 – 1198) married Henry I (1127 – 1181), Count of Champagne, in 1164.  They had four children.   2. Alix, Countess of Blois Alix of France (1151 – 1197) married Theobold V (1130 – 1191), Count of Blois, in 1164.  They had seven children. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaines Children and Grandchildren: Her First Marriage Second Marriage: Henry II of England After Eleanor of Aquitaine’s first marriage was annulled, she married Henry FitzEmpress (1133 – 1189), later Henry II of England, the son of Empress Matilda, would-be English queen. 1. William IX, Count of Poitiers William IX (1153 – 1156), Count of Poitiers 2. Henry the Young King Henry (1155 – 1183) the Young King married Margaret of France (betrothed November 2, 1160, married August 27, 1172).  Her father was Louis VII of France, Eleanor of Aquitaine’s first husband, and her mother was Louis’ second wife, Constance of Castile; Henry and Margaret shared two older half-sisters, Marie and Alix. After Henry’s death she married Bela III of Hungary in 1186. William of England (1177 – 1177), born premature, died three days after birth 3. Matilda, Duchess of Saxony and of Bavaria Matilda (1156 – 1189) of England, married as his second wife, Henry the Lion, Duke of Saxony and of Bavaria. Their children lived in England after their father was deposed in 1180 until their mother’s death; William, the youngest child, was born in that exile period. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Matilda, Duchess of Saxony 4. Richard I of England Richard I (1157 – 1199) of England, married Berengaria of Navarre (1170 – 1230); they had no children 5. Geoffrey II, Duke of Brittany Geoffrey II (1158 – 1186), Duke of Brittany, married Constance, Duchess of Brittany (1161 – 1201) in 1181. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Geoffrey II of Brittany 6. Eleanor, Queen of Castile Eleanor (1162 – 1214) of England married Alfonso VIII (1155 – 1214), King of Castile, in 1177 More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Eleanor, Queen of Castille 7. Joan, Queen of Sicily Joan (1165 – 1199) of England, married first William II (1155 – 1189) of Sicily in 1177, then married, as his fifth of six wives, Raymond VI (1156 – 1222) of Toulouse in 1197. More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through Joan, Queen of Sicily 8. John of England John (1166 – 1216) of England, known as John Lackland, married first Isabella (~1173 – 1217), Countess of Gloucester, in 1189 (betrothed 1176, annulled 1199, she married twice more), then second, in 1200, Isabella (~1188 – 1246), Countess of Angoulà ªme (she remarried after John’s death). More details and generations: Eleanor of Aquitaine’s Descendants Through John, King of England Two of Eleanors Ancestors (Grandchildren / Great-Grandchildren) were canonized as saints in the Roman Catholic Church:  Ferdinand II, King of Castile and Leà ³n, Isabelle of France The Royal Houses Listed here are some of the descendants of Eleanor of Aquitaine -- children, grandchildren and great grandchildren only -- who were kings, queens, empresses (the women usually as consorts though a few ruled in their own right): England: Henry the Young King, Richard I of England, John of England, Eleanor Fair Maid of Brittany was for a time proposed as the rightful ruler of England, Henry III of England. Edward I of England France: Blanche of Castile, Queen of France, Louis IX of France Spain (Castile, Leon, Aragon): Eleanor, Queen of Castile, Ferdinand II, King of Castile and Leà ³n, Berengaria, Queen of Castile and Leà ³n (ruled Castile briefly in her own right), Eleanor of Castile, Queen of Aragon, Henry of Castile Portugal: Urraca of Castile, Queen of Portugal, Sancho II of Portugal, Afonso III of Portugal Scotland: Joan of England, Queen of Scotland, Margaret of England, Queen of Scotland Other: Otto IV, Holy Roman Emperor, Richard of Cornwall, King of the Romans, Isabella of England, Holy Roman Empress, Charles I of Sicily, Marie of Champagne, Empress of Constantinople, Alice of Champagne, Queen of Cyprus, Berengaria of Leà ³n, Queen of Jerusalem, Eleanor of Portugal, Queen of Denmark, Eleanor de Montfort, Princess of Wales More About Eleanor of Aquitaine Eleanor of Aquitaine BiographySiblings of Eleanor of Aquitaine